home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT1022>
- <title>
- Aug. 01, 1994: Cinema:Hollywood's Huck Finns
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Aug. 01, 1994 This is the beginning...:Rwanda/Zaire
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ARTS & MEDIA/CINEMA, Page 58
- Hollywood's Huck Finns
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> A cluster of new releases features lost, fatherless boys adrift
- </p>
- <p>By Richard Schickel
- </p>
- <p> In The Client, an 11-year-old boy named Mark Sway (Brad Renfro)
- must get out of dire straits on his own because his father is
- long gone and his mother is slatternly and foolish. In Angels
- in the Outfield, an 11-year-old boy named Roger (Joseph Gordon-Levitt)
- is left in a foster home by his feckless father and requires
- the intervention of a heavenly host to help him. In North, an
- 11-year-old boy named North (Elijah Wood) becomes so disaffected
- from his parents that he chooses "free agency" and spends the
- rest of the picture trying to get other grownups to pick up
- his contract.
- </p>
- <p> What's going on here? A lost-boy trend? A commercial coincidence,
- based on such earlier successes with this theme as the Home
- Alone pictures, Terminator 2 and most of Steven Spielberg's
- oeuvre? An attempt by sly Hollywood to suggest that the family
- values it has but recently renewed its oath to uphold and defend
- are actually missing in much of America? Or--worst-case scenario--an effort to subvert those values right in the middle of
- movies that are marketed and rated as family entertainment?
- </p>
- <p> Possibly none of the above. Or some unlikely combination of
- them all. In generalizing about movies, it's always best to
- assume that business is being conducted as usual--that is
- to say, with a certain casualness about the moral implications
- of the products. Hey, got enough worries thinking about the
- weekend grosses.
- </p>
- <p> On that score, the producers can probably relax about The Client.
- Of the boys of this summer, Mark Sway is the most interesting.
- He's a sort of updated Huck Finn. Mark is smart, self-reliant
- and deeply suspicious of grownups--with good reason, as it
- turns out. Out in the woods, smoking cigarettes stolen from
- Mom, he encounters a man in the process of committing suicide.
- Trying (and failing) to prevent it--the sequence is good and
- scary--Mark learns where a certain very interesting body is
- buried.
- </p>
- <p> Talk about Huck! This kid is soon up the creek without raft
- or paddle. The Mafia wants to prevent him from talking about
- the stiff, and an ambitious, media-mad federal prosecutor (Tommy
- Lee Jones at his smarmy best) is equally determined to get his
- testimony. Mark's only ally is a nice lady lawyer (Susan Sarandon),
- shaky-brave and, since she's lost her own children in an ugly
- divorce, ready to do a little surrogate mothering.
- </p>
- <p> Director Joel Schumacher has made the most successful movie
- yet of a John Grisham novel. Its acting is the best, its paranoia
- and its plotting are fairly plausible and, despite its obligations
- to thriller conventions, it says something pretty truthful about
- what it's like to be young and neglected these days. Finally,
- in Brad Renfro the filmmakers have a real find--a tough, appealing
- kid whose instinct is not to beg for sympathy but to let it
- accrue to him naturally.
- </p>
- <p> This is wisdom not vouchsafed to the creators of Angels in the
- Outfield, a remake of a dryer, less hungrily sentimental 1952
- movie of the same title. A moment before he is abandoned, young
- Roger asks his father when they might become a family again.
- "When the Angels win the pennant," the father says. He is talking
- about the more hopeless of the Los Angeles baseball teams. That
- night Roger offers up prayers, and seraphim respond. With their
- help, the Angels start winning. Only Roger can see the small-a
- angels, and so he is needed to tell the perpetually riled-up
- manager (Danny Glover) what moves to make when they're present.
- Thus man and boy are forced to bond. Will the Angels win the
- pennant? Will the skipper keep his cool? Will Roger find the
- father figure he needs? If you're asking those questions, you're
- just the sucker this movie is looking for.
- </p>
- <p> North too is in touch with the supernatural. Wherever he goes,
- a nameless figure played by Bruce Willis turns up in various
- guises to help him. Director Rob Reiner strives hard for the
- tones of a fable, but the result is far from fabulous. There
- is something smug about North, and about the entire movie. All
- the substitute parents he interviews are as selfish as North's
- folks are, and the movie posits a mass movement in which other
- kids, all spoiled rotten, attempt to emulate North. At least
- the lost boys in the other movies have authentic problems and
- they don't suggest, as North does, that American loathsomeness
- has reached universal proportions.
- </p>
- <p> Good or bad, realistic or fantastic in tone, all these movies
- reflect a profound unease with the present state of our domestic
- arrangements. At the end of all of them, their resourceful little
- heroes are safely clasped to loving bosoms, but in every case
- the piety seems perfunctory, nowhere near as affecting as the
- troubles the boys have seen.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-